Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics ; 29(4: Biophotonics):1-8, 2023.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2213350

ABSTRACT

Plasmonic metasurface biosensing has shown great potential in label-free detection of bio-nanoparticles with various sizes, such as cancer antigens, exosomes and SARS-CoV-2 virus. It typically relies on the immunoassay, but current studies usually neglect the perfect size matching between each target bio-nanoparticle and the surface near-field domain, which should be very critical for the enhancement of detection performance. In order to maximize the immunodetection capability for each bio-nanoparticle, we propose a plasmonic meta-biosensor based on the field-customized mechanism. Our design overcomes the serious interference of biofunctionalization and accomplishes a sensitivity of 27 times higher than the conventional nanoplasmonic counterpart. Our method also builds the important basis of single bio-nanoparticle immunodetection by a plasmonic metasurface. The customized plasmonic metasensing study implies a promising way towards ultra-low concentration biosensing or even single bio-nanoparticle detection for high-performance point-of-care-testing in the near future.

2.
Hepatol Commun ; 5(1): 12-23, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1204738

ABSTRACT

Although abnormal liver chemistries are linked to a higher risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related death, liver manifestations may be diverse and even confusing. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of published liver manifestations and described the liver damage in patients with COVID-19 who died or discharged alive. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, medRxiv, bioRxiv, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and three Chinese electronic databases through April 22, 2020. We analyzed pooled data on liver chemistries stratified by the main clinical outcome of COVID-19, using a fixed or random-effects model. In our meta-analysis of 19 studies, which included a total of 4,103 patients, the pooled mean alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels were, respectively, 31.7 IU/L and 51.0 IU/L in the patients with COVID-19 who died and 27.7 IU/L and 32.9 IU/L in those discharged alive (both P < 0.0001). Compared with the patients discharged alive, those who died tended to have lower albumin levels but longer prothrombin time and higher international normalized ratio. Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, according to the main clinical outcome of COVID-19, we comprehensively describe three patterns of liver impairment related to COVID-19: hepatocellular injury, cholestasis, and hepatocellular disfunction. The patients who died from COVID-19 tended to have different liver chemistries from those discharged alive. Special caution should be given to the patients with a relatively higher index of liver chemistries.

3.
J Chin Med Assoc ; 84(4): 423-427, 2021 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1087836

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) posed a major threat to the clinical practice of orthopedic surgeons, especially in the emergency department. We aim to present: (1) the criteria established by the Surgery Management Committee of Taipei Veterans General Hospital in response to COVID-19 and (2) the impact of COVID-19 screening on orthopedic trauma patients in the emergency department. METHODS: From April 1 to April 30, 2020, all orthopedic trauma patients in the emergency department were screened for COVID-19 if they fulfilled any of the following: (1) travel from abroad within 14 days, (2) high-risk occupation, (3) contact or cluster history with a COVID-19-positive patient, and (4) any associated symptom, including fever up to 38°C, cough, sore throat, rhinorrhea, loss of taste or smell, muscle soreness, malaise, or shortness of breath. We recorded details on the injury, fever, management, and associated outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 163 orthopedic trauma patients presenting to the emergency department, 24 were screened for COVID-19; of these, 22 received surgery. Sixty-two patients received surgery without screening for COVID-19. Fever was the most common reason to screen for COVID-19 (N = 20; 83.3%). No patients were COVID-19 positive. Screened patients had a significantly longer mean interval from presentation to the emergency department to surgery (2.7 ± 2.5 vs. 1.5 ± 0.8 days, p = 0.037). Of the 20 patients screened because of fever, the focus was not identified in 12 (60.0%) patients. The other eight had urinary tract infection (N = 6; 27.2%), septic hip (N = 1; 4.6%), and concomitant pneumonia and urinary tract infection (N = 1; 4.6%). The mean duration of fever and hospital stay was 4.3 ± 4.6 and 8.7 ± 4.9 days, respectively. There were no thromboembolic events, surgical complications, or in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: We developed safe and reliable screening criteria for this COVID-19 pandemic. The delay in surgery was reasonable and did not adversely affect in-patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Fractures, Bone , Orthopedics , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Fever , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Taiwan , Young Adult
4.
J Chin Med Assoc ; 84(2): 171-176, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1066458

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), which began in December 2019, spread mostly from person to person through respiratory droplets. A recommendation was issued to postpone all elective surgical practices. However, some confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients required life-saving emergent surgeries. METHODS: To facilitate emergent surgical interventions for these patients, we have reviewed the current literature and established an algorithm of precautions to be taken by operating room team members during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: The initial algorithm of preparation for surgical intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic was relatively simple. However, the abrupt increase of confirmed COVID-19 cases due to returned overseas travelers since mid-March 2020 disrupted the routine hospital clinical service. Due to the large number of febrile patients, the algorithm was therefore revised according to travel history, occupation, contact and cluster history (TOCC), unexplained fever/symptoms, and emergent/nonemergent surgery. TOCC (+) patients presenting with otherwise unexplained fever/symptoms would be regarded as belonging to the fifth category of "severe special infectious pneumonia." If the patient requires emergent surgery to relieve the non-life-threatening disorders, two times of negative COVID-19 tests are necessary before the operation is approved. For life-threatening situations without two negative results of COVID-19 tests, the operation schedule should be approved by the Chairman of Surgery Management Committee. CONCLUSION: The application of a clear and integrated algorithm for operating room team members aids in effective personal protective equipment facilitation to keep both healthcare providers and patients safe as well as to prevent hospital-based transmission of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Operating Rooms , SARS-CoV-2 , Algorithms , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Infection Control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Taiwan/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL